[Botan-devel] Why Pooling_Allocator?
lloyd at randombit.net
Fri Oct 14 19:50:25 EDT 2005
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:15:00PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 06:31:38PM -0400, Jack Lloyd wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:43:11AM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > > Profiling showed that the problem was that our code was spending >96%
> > > of all CPU time in Pooling_Allocator::deallocate. Unsurprisingly,
> > > swapping in a trivial allocator implementation that simply deferred to
> > > malloc() and free() gave a huge improvement in performance -- about a
> > > factor of 25x overall throughput.
> > Could you try the patch Matt posted to the list and see if that helps? I think
> > it probably will, but if it doesn't, I'll need to spend some time looking for
> > the other dragons.
> For some reason, I don't seem to be getting his emails to the list.
> However, I'm pretty sure that it's the same patch he checked into our
> mainline to fix our problem, so it should be fine :-).
Sorry, didn't realize that you were also a Monotone dev.
More information about the botan-devel