[cryptography] OpenSSL 1.0.0 released

Kevin W. Wall kevin.w.wall at gmail.com
Wed Mar 31 11:44:21 EDT 2010

Adam Back wrote:
> I dont believe it was intended to be rude, just a tongue in cheek way
> of saying that the attack is impractical or inapplicable to openSSL.
> You have to have a bit of history perhaps to appreciate Peter's
> comments - he's actually the author of many very funny and insightful
> comments and articles on the state of applied cryptography :)

Totally agree, not to mention tomorrow (in the USA) is April Fool's
day. Take a look at the history of some of the "RFC"s submitted on
April 1st and you will see what I mean. It's a tradition.

BTW, sorry if I offended you or anyone else. That was certainly
not my intent.

Kevin W. Wall
"The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
We cause accidents."        -- Nathaniel Borenstein, co-creator of MIME

More information about the cryptography mailing list