[cryptography] philosophical question about strengths and attacks at impossible levels
pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz
Sat Nov 20 01:27:36 EST 2010
travis+ml-rbcryptography at subspacefield.org writes:
>Does the fact that parts of Stuxnet was signed by two valid certs
>count as a cryptographic failure?
The crypto worked perfectly, it was everything around it that failed.
(Which has been the case for every other security failure involving modern
crypto as well ).
 Just for the nitpickers, that means properly-designed crypto using non-toy
More information about the cryptography