[cryptography] philosophical question about strengths and attacks at impossible levels

travis+ml-rbcryptography at subspacefield.org travis+ml-rbcryptography at subspacefield.org
Tue Nov 23 15:51:49 EST 2010

On what basis do you make the (implicit) assumption that cert privkeys
were actually stolen?

Note; I do not claim to have any evidence the pubkeys were factored,
etc., I'm just wondering on what basis you jump to assuming it was
a node security failure.
Good code works on most inputs; correct code works on all inputs.
My emails do not have attachments; it's a digital signature that your mail
program doesn't understand. | http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/ 
If you are a spammer, please email john at subspacefield.org to get blacklisted.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20101123/56dd7239/attachment.asc>

More information about the cryptography mailing list