[cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a name-and-shame catalog (Re: really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors?)

ianG iang at iang.org
Fri Dec 2 11:32:52 EST 2011

On 3/12/11 03:14 AM, ianG wrote:
> ... Except, *natural person* rights can't be *reliably* contracted away.

oops, fix bloopers.  wish we had time to be lawyers too...


More information about the cryptography mailing list