[cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a name-and-shame catalog (Re: really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors?)

Peter Gutmann pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz
Sat Dec 3 22:53:51 EST 2011

ianG <iang at iang.org> writes:

>PS; we need a better name than DPI MITM.  For some reason I'm thinking of WITM.

Given that the whole reason for doing this silly-walk in the first place was to 
protect us against MITMs, I wouldn't use WITM, I'd call it a WTFITM.


More information about the cryptography mailing list