[cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a name-and-shame catalog (Re: really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors?)
pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz
Sat Dec 3 22:53:51 EST 2011
ianG <iang at iang.org> writes:
>PS; we need a better name than DPI MITM. For some reason I'm thinking of WITM.
Given that the whole reason for doing this silly-walk in the first place was to
protect us against MITMs, I wouldn't use WITM, I'd call it a WTFITM.
More information about the cryptography