[cryptography] rolling hashes, EDC/ECC vs MAC/MIC, etc.
nico at cryptonector.com
Sat May 21 17:00:38 EDT 2011
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 2:53 AM,
<travis+ml-rbcryptography at subspacefield.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 05:18:16PM -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
>> A function with
>> that property isn't a hash function.
> How do you figure?
Well, to be fair, a rolling hash is a hash function, proper. It may
well not be what we'd call a cryptographically secure function, and
I'll admit I'm not certain of that, that it is my intuition that a
rolling hash is not cryptographically secure. I find very little
research on cryptographically secure rolling hash functions (for
laughs though, search for "secure rolling hash"), but even so, I'm
having second thoughts about my statement above.
More information about the cryptography