[cryptography] The consequences of DigiNotar's failure
noloader at gmail.com
Sat Sep 17 10:10:56 EDT 2011
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:07 PM, M.R. <makrober at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16/09/11 09:16, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> The problem is that people will probably die
>> due Digitar's failure.
> I am not the one to defend DigiNotar, but I would not make such
> dramatic assumption.
> No one actively working against a government that is known to engage
> in extra-legal killings will trust SSL secured e-mail to protect him
> or her from the government surveillance. If this particular case, if
> the most often repeated hypothesis of who did it and why is correct,
> it was probably done for some bottom net-fishing and will likely result
> with a whole bunch of "little people" with secret files that will make
> them "second-class" citizens for a long, long time, ineligible for
> government jobs and similar. (For instance, I'd expect them to end up
> on some oriental no-fly list).
For what its worth, I noticed OpenBSD provided an update to TOR today
because Iran is blocking TOR. The patch (from upstream) circumvents
the blocking (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=131621507819091&w=2).
More information about the cryptography