[cryptography] Duplicate primes in lots of RSA moduli

Bodo Moeller bmoeller at acm.org
Thu Feb 16 06:30:27 EST 2012


On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:


> You are right that RFC4880 does not demand that the key expiration date
> is put into a hashed subpacket.  But not doing so would be stupid.
>

I call it a "protocol failure", you call it "stupid", but Jon calls it a
"feature" (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.openpgp/4557/).

Bodo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20120216/6bd8c61a/attachment.html>


More information about the cryptography mailing list