[cryptography] Well, that's depressing. Now what?
smb at cs.columbia.edu
Sat Jan 28 09:23:47 EST 2012
On Jan 27, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Noon Silk wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Steven Bellovin <smb at cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
>>> Or at least that's what everyone thought. More recently, various groups have begun to focus on
>>> a fly in the ointment: the practical implementation of this process. While quantum key distribution
>>> offers perfect security in practice, the devices used to send quantum messages are inevitably
>> This is only surprising if you assume large values of "everyone". Anyone in the real world has
>> long since worried about implementations. Remember Bob Morris' Rule 1 of cryptanalysis: check
>> for plaintext. (http://www.ieee-security.org/Cipher/ConfReports/conf-rep-Crypto95.html)
> So why didn't one of these "real world" people point this out, to
> researchers? It's a bit too easy to claim something as obvious when
> someone just told you.
https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/blog/2007-06/2007-06-29.html is something I wrote 4.5
years ago. You'll note that it mentions the issue of sending more than one photon per
bit. Bruce Schneier has often written on it:
If you go to http://email@example.com/msg07680.html
you'll see a whole thread that I, among many others, participated in.
--Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
More information about the cryptography