[cryptography] Well, that's depressing. Now what?

Kevin W. Wall kevin.w.wall at gmail.com
Sat Jan 28 15:09:35 EST 2012

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
> Fine. Good point.
> For future reference (just so the researchers are aware, you understand):
> Quantum foo does not protect against:
> Stealing interesting things before they reach the encryption bit.
> Employees who copy the plain text onto USB drives and take them home.
> Male-pattern baldness.

Hmmm... are you sure? I thought the latter was caused by quantum
entangled hair follicles.

Blog: http://off-the-wall-security.blogspot.com/
"The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
We *cause* accidents."        -- Nathaniel Borenstein

More information about the cryptography mailing list