[cryptography] Well, that's depressing. Now what?
Kevin W. Wall
kevin.w.wall at gmail.com
Sat Jan 28 15:09:35 EST 2012
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
> Fine. Good point.
> For future reference (just so the researchers are aware, you understand):
> Quantum foo does not protect against:
> Stealing interesting things before they reach the encryption bit.
> Employees who copy the plain text onto USB drives and take them home.
> Male-pattern baldness.
Hmmm... are you sure? I thought the latter was caused by quantum
entangled hair follicles.
"The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
We *cause* accidents." -- Nathaniel Borenstein
More information about the cryptography