[cryptography] non-decryptable encryption

David Adamson adamson.david.jr at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 10:24:39 EDT 2012


I have invented even simpler encryption method than yours that is also
non-decrypt-able.
It uses a special function F(x)=0 where 0 is only one bit.

It works like this:
1. Take plaintext P.
2. Ciphertext=F(P)

No one can decrypt my ciphertext, and it has advantage over your
method since it does not need much space (nor transmission).

But I had also troubles to publish it on CRYPTO 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
I will try this year on the Rump session.

David


On 6/18/12, Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
> I too have invented an encryption method that is not decrypt able by any
> method.
>
> It woks like this:
> 1: Take plaintext.
> 2: XOR with a stream of random data, throw away the random data.
> 3:…
> 4: Profit!
>
> For some reason I cannot get folk to understand the brilliance of my method,
> probably because they are all stupid, closed minded smelly jerks who
> couldn't understand a good idea if it fell on them.
> They all kept saying that having encryption that is not decryptable is
> pointless, but rathter than listening to what the so called experts said, I
> decided to simply rage against their opinions and, just for good measure,
> insult them too…
>
> So far it's working great…
>
> W
>
>
>
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 6:56 AM, Givonne Cirkin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> My name is Givon Zirkind.  I am a computer scientist.  I developed a
>> method of encryption that is not decryptable by method.
>> You can read my paper at: http://bit.ly/Kov1DE
>>
>> My colleagues agree with me.  But, I have not been able to get pass peer
>> review and publish this paper.  In my opinion, the refutations are
>> ridiculous and just attacks -- clear misunderstandings of the methods.
>> They do not explain my methods and say why they do not work.
>>
>> I have a 2nd paper:  http://bit.ly/LjrM61
>> This paper also couldn't get published.  This too I was told doesn't
>> follow the norm and is not non-decryptable.  Which I find odd, because it
>> is merely the tweaking of an already known method of using prime numbers.
>>
>> I am asking the hacking community for help.  Help me test my methods.  The
>> following message is encrypted using one of my new methods.  Logically, it
>> should not be decryptable by "method".  If you can decrypt it, please let
>> me know you did & how.
>>
>> CipherText:
>>
>> 113-5-95-5-65-46-108-108-92-96-54-23-51-163-30-7-34-117-117-30-110-36-12-102-99-30-77-102
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I have a website about this:  www.givonzirkind.weebly.com
>> For information about the Transcendental Encryption Codec click on the
>> "more" tab.
>> Also, on Facebook,
>> https://www.facebook.com/TranscendentalEncryptionCodecTec
>>
>> Givon Zirkind
>>
>>
>>
>> You @ 37.com - The world's easiest free Email address !
>> _______________________________________________
>> cryptography mailing list
>> cryptography at randombit.net
>> http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
>
> --
> "Go on, prove me wrong. Destroy the fabric of the universe. See if I care."
> -- Terry Prachett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at randombit.net
> http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
>



More information about the cryptography mailing list