[cryptography] non-decryptable encryption

Givonne Cirkin givonne at 37.com
Tue Jun 19 20:30:02 EDT 2012

absolutely true.  i mentioned (in my article) that after explaining the masking.

--- jthorn at astro.indiana.edu wrote:

From: Jonathan Thornburg <jthorn at astro.indiana.edu>
To: jamesd at echeque.com, cryptography at randombit.net
Subject: Re: [cryptography] non-decryptable encryption
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:30:59 -0400 (EDT)

The digit sequence
(or its equivalent in binary, hex, or your other favorite base)
never repeats, but provides no security whatsoever.  One-time pads
need nonrepeating sequences *which the adversary can't predict*.

-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]" <jthorn at astro.indiana-zebra.edu>
   Dept of Astronomy & IUCSS, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
   "Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the
    powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral."
                                      -- quote by Freire / poster by Oxfam
cryptography mailing list
cryptography at randombit.net

You @ 37.com - The world's easiest free Email address !

More information about the cryptography mailing list