[cryptography] Fwd: NIST Selects Winner of Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA-3) Competition
taralx at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 23:16:01 EDT 2012
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM, ianG <iang at iang.org> wrote:
> One thing I don't understand from a quick reading is the business about
> KECCAK's flexibility. At a theoretical level, it's all very well saying
> that we can dial in security and performance, but in practical
> cryptoplumbing we need some standard measurands. How do we do this? Are we
> waiting on NIST to come out with some lengths, or are we really requiring
> our cryptoplumbers to actually understand the innards of KECCAK and wind the
> dials themselves?
There's only two tweakables: word length (pretty much always 64 bits)
and digest length (256 or 512 bits, practically).
Taral <taralx at gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
More information about the cryptography