[cryptography] urandom vs random

Tony Arcieri bascule at gmail.com
Fri Aug 16 15:55:56 EDT 2013

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Patrick Mylund Nielsen <
cryptography at patrickmylund.com> wrote:

> You replied with a link to a paper that states that both /dev/random and
> /dev/urandom have the same weaknesses, and said that "/dev/random isn't
> robust."

I was quoting the title of the paper in the context of a thread in which
someone claimed that /dev/random should be used in lieu of /dev/random.
That's all I was pointing out.

Tony Arcieri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20130816/db34dd34/attachment.html>

More information about the cryptography mailing list