[cryptography] Potential funding for crypto-related projects
michael at briarproject.org
Tue Jul 2 08:22:30 EDT 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 30/06/13 20:32, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Michael Rogers:
>> I'd love to see a revitalisation of remailer research, focussing
>> on unlinkability (which we know many people would benefit from)
>> rather than sender anonymity (which fewer people need, and which
>> is prone to abuse that discourages people from running mixes).
> I'd also like to see revitalisation of remailer research. Though
> anonymity as Tor is designed is specifically about unlinkability.
> To reduce it to sender anonymity is pretty ... ridiculous. What one
> does with an anonymous communications channel is up to them - many
> people do actually want that feature for chatting, web browsing,
> news, email, etc.
I'm not sure if I understand you right, but it sounds like you think I
was saying that Tor is only designed for sender anonymity, and that
sender anonymity isn't useful in general. I wasn't saying either of
My point was much smaller in scope: remailers have tried to provide
sender anonymity for email, but in the current climate that's useful
to fewer people than unlinkability for email, which a remailer-like
system could provide more easily than sender anonymity.
By all means let's build that remailer-like system on top of Tor, if
it can be done in such a way that the low-latency and high-latency
traffic share anonymity sets.
If on the other hand it's effectively two different networks sharing
an implementation then it might make sense to build a separate system.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cryptography