[cryptography] Potential funding for crypto-related projects

John Young jya at pipeline.com
Thu Jul 4 11:43:09 EDT 2013

The more fiercely defended security system (anything)
the more likely indefensible. Best ones require constant
patching and understatement, without exculpation, apologia
and bullying arrogance of ignorance.

But cloying humility, obsequiousness and masochism
seduces sadists for backdooring STD.


At 08:34 AM 7/4/2013, you wrote:
>On 30/06/13 at 01:04am, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > Yeah, about that...
> >
> > Have you seen the most recent paper by Egger et al?
>IMHO that's is unfair. There are many publications on Tor
>vulnerabilities as well, and this is unavoidable.
>Are you sure that in the next two months Tor will not be the main actor
>of a similar publication?
>You should have pointed us over principles and design, rather than
>By principles, I like i2p more than tor, for its decentralization, and
>for its focus on providing an "anonymous" network layer than a "exit
>point" to existing internet. But this is completely personal, and each
>of us as his/her requirements to satisfy. And, by the way, I am aware
>that the most important bug (which can't be corrected) of any systems is
>the human who is using it.
>With respect,
>    danimoth
>cryptography mailing list
>cryptography at randombit.net

More information about the cryptography mailing list