[cryptography] Cryptographers win Turing award
iang at iang.org
Thu Mar 14 07:52:08 EDT 2013
I admit to total ignorance, and have an intuition that this is
probabilistically unacceptable. Of anyone wishes to explain the
significance of their work, I'd be grateful. Meanwhile, here are the
things I've decrypted:
Shafi Goldwasser and Silvio Micali laid the foundations of modern
theoretical cryptography, taking it from a field of heuristics and hopes
to a mathematical science with careful definitions and security models,
precise specifications of adversarial capabilities, and rigorous
reductions from formally defined computational problems. Their results,
jointly and with others, established the now-standard definitions of
security for the fundamental primitives of encryption and digital
signatures, and provided exemplary implementations meeting the stated
security objectives. Even more importantly, their work helped to
establish the tone and character of modern cryptographic research.
Jointly and in collaboration with others, they provided stunning
innovations in the form of random functions, interactive proofs, and
zero-knowledge protocols, with implications beyond cryptography to
theoretical computer science in general.
ACM Press release is helpful:
Wikipedia is too:
better copy of the 1984 article:
That article in networkworld is fatally flawed, and thus meets and
exceeds the standard for press commentary.
On 13/03/13 23:57 PM, Kevin W. Wall wrote:
> MIT professors Shafi Goldwasser and Silvio Micali were
> selected as this year's ACM Turing award winner.
> Their work on introducing mathematical formalism to the
> field of cryptography was cited.
> Blog: http://off-the-wall-security.blogspot.com/
> "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
> is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
> We *cause* accidents." -- Nathaniel Borenstein
> cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at randombit.net
More information about the cryptography