[cryptography] why did OTR succeed in IM?
James A. Donald
jamesd at echeque.com
Sat Mar 23 16:03:04 EDT 2013
On 2013-03-24 3:25 AM, Jon Callas wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Mar 23, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Ben Laurie <ben at links.org> wrote:
>> On 23 March 2013 09:25, ianG <iang at iang.org> wrote:
>>> Someone on another list asked an interesting question:
>>> Why did OTR succeed in IM systems, where OpenPGP and x.509 did not?
>> Because Adium built it in?
> Yeah. And it just worked.
The hard part of cryptography is always UI.
More information about the cryptography