[cryptography] New cipher

Ethan Heilman eth3rs at gmail.com
Mon Nov 4 18:33:10 EST 2013


Source code would be nice as well.


On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Mansour Moufid <mansourmoufid at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 04:17 +0000, Roth Paxton wrote:
>
> > Cryptographyuniversal.com is my website. at Niko. I accept your criticism
> > and you are correct that I was angry at the IACR when the site was
> > published. However I am only an amatuer cryptographer. Some of the
> > math is wrong. The site is merely an exposition of a new type of
> > cipher that is fairly strong. If you will take the time to read you
> > will notice that the structure of the cipher is sound and much more
> > manageable if the "matrices" (blocks) are reduced to 5 (4x4) (128 bit
> > blocks). I have been working on refining it but cannot alter my site
> > with my smartpad. Please ignore the massive size and concentrate more
> > on the structure.
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
> If I may, I would suggest structuring the website into sections with
> clear headers. Clearer wording would also help, for example, by "cube
> comprised of 1000 parts" you might mean a vector in some space of
> dimension 3.
>
> Perhaps you could give a step-by-step example of encryption with this
> algorithm, with very small matrices. It's hard to understand as it is.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at randombit.net
> http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20131104/9fcb94bf/attachment.html>


More information about the cryptography mailing list