[cryptography] NIST Randomness Beacon (andrew cooke) (and Andy Isaacson, et al.)
Joshua Kingsolver Price
jprice169 at ivytech.edu
Wed Nov 13 12:10:57 EST 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Something of a noob question, but what about random.org? Is there some
reason why this site isn't used by the cryptographically wise? It
seems that they already offer public entropy, and from a very good
source. Sure you still can't use it for keys, but you couldn't use ANY
public source for that, so what's the difference?
> Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 05:15:33 -0300 From: andrew
> cooke <andrew at acooke.org> To: "d.nix" <d.nix at comcast.net> Cc:
> cypherpunks at cpunks.org, cryptography at metzdowd.com,
> "cryptography at randombit.net" <cryptography at randombit.net> Subject:
> Re: [cryptography] NIST Randomness Beacon Message-ID:
> <20131110081533.GH24368 at acooke.org> Content-Type: text/plain;
> the idea of a service that provides data unknown before a certain
> date (like a photo of a recent newspaper) was suggested here -
> for fun, i implemented that here - http://colorlessgreen.net/ (the
> random value is updated every 50000 secs, roughly, and encoded as
> a "memorable phrase")
> of course, in this case, a PRNG was used, and i am not NIST (so i
> am not guaranteeing unpredictability ot autonomy to the same
> extent!), and the output is only ~50 bits in size.
> as far as i know, no-one uses it for anything...
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 08:28:17PM -0800, d.nix wrote:
>> surely someone here has an opinion...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cryptography