[cryptography] Quality of HAVEGE algorithm for entropy?
Joachim at Strombergson.com
Thu Nov 28 04:12:19 EST 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Stephan Mueller wrote:
> The only challenge that I see with Havege is that the algorithm is
> quite complex and that the description does not fully explain why and
> where the entropy comes from. Looking into the source code of
> oneiteration.h, the code is also not fully clear.
Havege is (if I remember correctly) a magnificent example of Duff's
The code tries to force instruction cache misses at different points on
the switch-loop thereby causing a lot of pipe flushes and instruction
loads from lower level caches all the way to main store.
A goof comparison to Havege is Jytter that basically (AFAIK) is trying
to get entropy from the same source (measuring variance in instruction
timing). But Havege tries to force the creation of variance and can thus
generate higher rate of entropy. In my measurements I get kbps from
Jytter byt Mbps from Havege. I have yet to compare the quality as
measured using Dieharder, but from my memory Havege was really good.
> Considering the grilling I get with a similar RNG that I ask to be
> used as a seed source for /dev/random or other crypto libs (see
> thread http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/11/582), I would have concerns on
> the algorithm.
As long as one does not rely on one source - and _always_ feed the
entropy to the RNG-CSPRNG chain (not replace the chain and connect the
source directly to /dev/random output like with Bull Mountain) I have a
hard time to see where much controversy would emerge. As long as the
source produces ok quality entropy.
One issue I'm thinking of is if you have more than one source, but one
of them dwafs the other sources in kapacity. Say having a microphone
providing whitish noise at kbps rate and then having RdRand from your
Haswell CPU generating data at Gbps speed, will the microphone entropy
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours
Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cryptography