[cryptography] [Cryptography] Steganography and bringing encryption to a piece of paper

Pete Wayner pete at wayner.org
Sat Jul 19 12:07:29 EDT 2014

You're quite right. If anyone is interested in some of the more information
theoretical approaches to steganography, I have several chapters about it
in *Disappearing Cryptography. *Pretty rudimentary, of course, but it might
be a help.


On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Sampo Syreeni <decoy at iki.fi> wrote:

> So what *is* it with you people? Can't you see that steganography really
> starts and ends with information and coding theory, unlike cryptography?
> Its bounds really necessarily and from the start have to do with noise and
> uncertainty, whereas crypto protocols only deal with clean data and
> computational complexity (eventually, preferably, proven-to-be-hard
> one-way-functions). Steganography really is its own, separate field,
> eventhough it shares most of the randomness, signal processing, complexity
> and whatnot, framework, with current crypto proper.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20140719/b6a0bf43/attachment.html>

More information about the cryptography mailing list